MEET YOUR NEW AUDIO PLAYLIST

Hey everyone, Hailey here! Today, we’re diving into something every architect needs to master - project delivery methods.

Why does it matter? Because the right approach can make or break a project. It affects timelines, budgets, collaboration, and overall success. So, let’s explore how to streamline workflows and make your projects run smoothly.

Simply put, project delivery methods define how a construction project is designed, contracted, and built. They outline roles, responsibilities, and how communication flows between architects, contractors, and clients. Choosing the right one aligns expectations, budgets, and deadlines from the start.

There are several approaches, but let’s focus on six of the most commonly used. The traditional design - bid - build method is where architects complete the design before contractors bid on the project. It’s a competitive process that gives clients full control, but it can slow things down and sometimes create friction between architects and contractors. Then there’s design - build, where the architect and contractor work under a single contract. This speeds up timelines and improves collaboration, but clients may have less control over choosing the contractor.

Another option is the construction manager at risk approach. Here, a construction manager joins early in the process, providing cost estimates and working alongside the architect to ensure the project stays within budget. While this offers cost control and smoother coordination, it comes with higher upfront fees. Integrated Project Delivery, or IPD, takes collaboration even further. In this method, all stakeholders share a single contract, aligning risks and rewards. It fosters teamwork and innovation, but it requires strong trust and clear communication to be effective.

For those who want full control, there’s the owner - build method, where the owner acts as both the client and contractor, directly managing construction. This can save costs, but it also demands a lot of time, expertise, and involvement. And finally, public - private partnerships, or P3s, are often used for large - scale infrastructure projects. These allow private companies and public entities to collaborate, which can provide funding opportunities, but they also involve complex agreements and lengthy approvals.

So how do you choose the right one? It depends on the size and complexity of your project, your budget, and your client’s priorities. Larger, more intricate projects often benefit from integrated project delivery or construction manager at risk, while smaller projects might be better suited for design - bid - build. If speed is the priority, design - build can help streamline the process. If cost control is key, competitive bidding in design - bid - build ensures a structured, budget - conscious approach.

Regardless of the method, success always comes down to clear communication, keeping client priorities at the forefront, and using the right tools to track progress. Technology can be a huge advantage here, with project management software helping to manage timelines, budgets, and collaboration in real time.

At the end of the day, mastering these methods will help you guide your clients effectively and deliver projects that truly meet their vision. Thanks for tuning in! I’d love to hear your thoughts - what’s your go - to project delivery method? Let me know!